Charging order protection means a creditor who sues an LLC owner personally cannot seize the LLC itself or force distributions. In Wyoming, the charging order is the sole remedy against an owner's LLC interest, protecting both multi-member and single-member LLCs from creditor takeover.
A surgeon in Cody, Wyoming, owns three rental properties through a Wyoming holding company. A patient files a malpractice claim that exceeds her insurance coverage by $1.4 million. The plaintiff's attorney finds the rental portfolio in discovery and files a motion to attach the membership interests. This article is what determines what happens next, statute by statute and case by case.
What "charging order" actually means
A charging order is a court order that "charges" the debtor's LLC membership interest with payment of an unsatisfied judgment. The order does not transfer ownership of the membership interest, does not give the creditor any voting or management rights, and does not allow the creditor to compel the LLC to make distributions.
The creditor with a charging order is functionally a "lien holder" against future distributions. If and when the LLC makes a distribution to the debtor-member, the distribution goes first to satisfy the charging order. If the LLC never distributes, the creditor never collects.
The doctrine traces to English partnership law (Partnership Act 1890) and was imported into US LLC statutes as a way to protect the non-debtor members of a closely-held entity from being forced into business with a stranger (the creditor). The policy rationale: the LLC is a chosen association of consenting members, and a personal creditor of one member should not be able to disrupt the business of the others.
The Wyoming statute (W.S. § 17-29-503)
The relevant statute is the Wyoming Limited Liability Company Act, codified at W.S. § 17-29-101 et seq. Section 503 governs charging orders. The statute reads (paraphrased; verify current text at the Wyoming Legislature site):
(a) On application by a judgment creditor of a member or transferee, the court may charge the transferable interest of the judgment debtor with payment of the unsatisfied judgment with interest. To the extent so charged, and except as provided in subsection (c), the judgment creditor has only the rights of a transferee of the transferable interest.
(b) A charging order constitutes a lien on the judgment debtor's transferable interest. The court may order a foreclosure of a lien on a transferable interest subject to the charging order at any time. The purchaser at the foreclosure sale has only the rights of a transferee.
(c) A judgment creditor of a member or transferee does not have the right to participate in the management or to cause dissolution of the limited liability company.
(d) This section provides the exclusive remedy by which a person seeking, in the capacity of judgment creditor, to enforce a judgment against a member or transferee may satisfy the judgment from the judgment debtor's transferable interest.
The operative phrase is in subsection (d): "exclusive remedy." A judgment creditor cannot foreclose on the membership interest in a way that gives them management or control. They cannot reach the LLC's assets directly. They are limited to the charging order against the transferable interest, which is the right to receive distributions.
Single-member coverage: where Wyoming differs from Florida
The Wyoming statute does not distinguish between single-member and multi-member LLCs. The "exclusive remedy" language in subsection (d) applies to both. This is the structural feature that makes Wyoming attractive to single-member LLC owners.
Compare Florida. Olmstead v. FTC, 44 So. 3d 76 (Fla. 2010), held that the Florida charging order was not the exclusive remedy for single-member Florida LLCs because the policy rationale (protecting the non-debtor members) does not apply when there are no other members. The Florida legislature responded by amending Fla. Stat. § 605.0503 to clarify exclusive-remedy treatment for multi-member LLCs only; single-member Florida LLCs remain at risk under Olmstead.
Wyoming has not adopted the Olmstead logic. The statute's text and the legislative history both suggest that the exclusive-remedy treatment applies regardless of the number of members. There is no Wyoming Supreme Court case overturning that reading as of this article's date.
The single-member protection is a structural reason single-asset rental properties, single-member holding companies, and single-member operating businesses are commonly formed in Wyoming rather than in Olmstead-vulnerable states.
What charging order protection does NOT do
Charging order protection is narrow. It does NOT:
- Protect the LLC's assets from a creditor's judgment AGAINST the LLC itself. If the LLC is sued (slip-and-fall on a rental, breach of contract by the LLC, employee tort), the LLC's assets are exposed. Charging-order protection only addresses creditors of the MEMBER, not creditors of the LLC.
- Survive a successful alter-ego attack. If a creditor proves that the LLC is the member's alter ego (no separateness, no recordkeeping, commingled funds, undercapitalized), a court can pierce the veil and reach the LLC's assets directly. Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 247 A.D. 144 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936), established the Instrumentality Rule for parent-subsidiary veil piercing; the doctrine has been adopted in many states. Curci Investments LLC v. Baldwin, 14 Cal. App. 5th 214 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017), is the modern California reverse-veil-piercing case for LLCs.
- Protect against a creditor with a pre-existing claim and a fraudulent-transfer argument. If you transfer assets into the LLC after a creditor's claim has accrued (or is reasonably foreseeable), the transfer can be unwound under fraudulent-transfer law. The Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (formerly the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act) is in force in most states.
- Protect against the IRS for unpaid federal taxes. The IRS has special collection powers (federal tax liens, levy authority under IRC § 6321 and § 6331) that override most state charging-order protections.
- Protect against a child-support or family-court judgment in some states. Family-court judgments often have priority over commercial judgments and may receive special treatment in collection actions.
The protection is real and meaningful within its proper scope. It is not a shield against every kind of judgment.
The operating agreement matters
Charging-order protection is a statute, but the statute interacts with the operating agreement. Two ways the OA matters:
First, the OA defines the "transferable interest" that the charging order can attach. Most OAs (and the Wyoming statute) treat the transferable interest as the right to receive distributions, NOT the right to vote or manage. The OA should explicitly state that managerial rights do not transfer to a charging-order creditor and that the creditor stands only in the position of a transferee for distribution purposes.
Second, the OA's distribution policy controls when the LLC distributes. A creditor with a charging order collects only when distributions actually flow. If the OA gives the manager (or the non-debtor members) discretion over distribution timing and amount, the manager can defer distributions during the charging-order period. The creditor waits indefinitely. This is sometimes called the "starving the lien" strategy. It is not bulletproof (a court may impose equitable relief if the deferral is in bad faith), but as a practical matter it dramatically reduces the present value of the charging order to the creditor.
Clint Coons of Anderson Business Advisors makes the point bluntly: a Wyoming LLC with a generic operating agreement is "a $100 state filing, not a defense." (https://andersonadvisors.com/charging-order-llc/) The OA does the work the statute alone cannot.
The Wyoming case law
Wyoming's case law on charging orders is thinner than many other states' (Florida, Delaware, California have generated more litigation). The Wyoming Supreme Court has not issued a published opinion squarely overturning the exclusive-remedy treatment for single-member LLCs. Lower-court decisions and bankruptcy court applications of Wyoming law have generally followed the statute's text.
This is not a guarantee. Case law develops over time. A future Wyoming Supreme Court decision could narrow or expand the statute's reach. The current state of Wyoming charging-order doctrine is favorable to LLC members, and that has been the consistent posture for the last decade.
For comparison, In re Albright, 291 B.R. 538 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2003), held that a single-member LLC interest could be turned over in bankruptcy because there were no other members to protect. The case is often cited as the warning case for single-member LLCs in any state that follows the Albright logic. Wyoming's statute is structured to resist the Albright outcome, but the bankruptcy posture (federal court, federal Bankruptcy Code) introduces variables that state-court collection actions do not present.
How attorneys actually structure for charging-order protection
Five practical structures asset-protection attorneys use:
- Multi-member structure with a non-spouse co-member. Even a 1% non-debtor co-member can strengthen the charging-order argument by introducing the "non-debtor member protection" rationale that Olmstead dismissed for single-member LLCs.
- Wyoming holding company with state-level child LLCs. The parent's charging-order protection insulates the children's assets from the parent's owner's personal creditors. This is the standard real estate investor architecture.
- Manager-managed structure with a non-debtor manager. Even if the debtor-member's interest is charged, a non-debtor manager controls distributions, which is the practical lever for "starving the lien."
- Substantive Operating Agreement with separateness, recordkeeping, anti-alter-ego, and discretionary distribution clauses. This is the OA work most filing services skip.
- Asset transfer timing that precedes any creditor claim. Fraudulent-transfer law unwinds transfers made after a claim accrues; transfers made BEFORE are not vulnerable to that argument.
Toby Mathis of Anderson Business Advisors typically combines all five in a real estate investor architecture. The total cost of the boutique-attorney work to build the structure correctly is in the $5,000 to $15,000 range, depending on portfolio complexity. The cost of NOT building it correctly is the loss of the protection in the moment you actually need it.
When the protection matters most
Charging-order protection matters when a personal creditor pursues you. The most common sources of personal creditors:
- Auto accident plaintiffs (where insurance coverage is exceeded)
- Medical malpractice plaintiffs (for licensed professionals)
- Personal guarantee enforcement (commercial loan default, lease default)
- Divorce property division (some jurisdictions; this is its own complex area)
- Personal tort claims (assault, intentional torts)
Charging-order protection does not matter when the LLC itself is sued. For that, you need a different layer: liability insurance, separateness practices, single-purpose entities, and the parent-child structure that contains exposure.
FAQ
What is charging order protection in Wyoming?
Charging order protection means a creditor who sues an LLC owner personally cannot seize the LLC itself or force distributions. In Wyoming, the charging order is the sole remedy against an owner's LLC interest, protecting both multi-member and single-member LLCs from creditor takeover.
Does Wyoming protect single-member LLCs the same as multi-member?
Yes, under W.S. § 17-29-503, the exclusive-remedy language applies regardless of the number of members. Wyoming has not adopted the Olmstead v. FTC logic that Florida applied to limit single-member protection. This is one of the reasons single-member LLCs are commonly formed in Wyoming rather than Florida or other Olmstead-influenced states.
Can a creditor force my Wyoming LLC to distribute money?
No. A charging order creditor stands in line for distributions if and when the LLC chooses to distribute. The creditor cannot compel a distribution, cannot vote the membership interest, and cannot reach the LLC's underlying assets. If the LLC defers distributions during the charging-order period, the creditor waits.
Does charging order protection survive bankruptcy?
The bankruptcy posture introduces federal variables that state collection law does not. In re Albright, 291 B.R. 538 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2003), is the warning case: a single-member LLC interest was turned over in bankruptcy. Wyoming's statute is structured to resist that outcome, but a federal bankruptcy court applying Wyoming law in a complex fact pattern is not the same risk profile as a state collection action.
Can the IRS use a charging order against my LLC?
The IRS has special collection powers under IRC § 6321 and § 6331 (federal tax liens and levy authority) that override most state charging-order protections. Charging-order protection generally does not apply to IRS collection of unpaid federal taxes.
How do I make charging-order protection actually work in practice?
Substantive operating agreement (separateness, recordkeeping, anti-alter-ego, discretionary distribution). Maintain separateness in practice, not just on paper (separate bank accounts, no commingling, formal documentation of decisions). Form the structure BEFORE a creditor claim arises (fraudulent-transfer law unwinds late transfers). Consider multi-member or holding-company structures for stronger protection. Hire a competent boutique asset-protection attorney for the structure work.
What happens if my Wyoming LLC is sued (not me personally)?
Charging-order protection does not apply when the LLC itself is sued. The LLC's assets are exposed to a judgment against the LLC. The protection that matters in that scenario is single-purpose entity structure (limit each LLC's assets so a judgment against one entity does not reach the others), liability insurance, and the substantive operating-agreement work that defends against alter-ego.
What we offer
Wyoming LLC formation and registered agent service. $99/year for the registered agent service. We file as organizer (your name off the public Articles), and we include a substantive operating agreement template with separateness, recordkeeping, anti-alter-ego, and charging-order remedy provisions. For multi-member structures, holding-company stacks, and complex asset-protection planning, we route to a boutique attorney partner at flat fee.
Order at /order.html. Questions at /contact.html.
Independent Curator Disclosure: This article cites Clint Coons (Anderson Business Advisors), Toby Mathis (Anderson Business Advisors), and court opinions including Olmstead v. FTC, In re Albright, Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., and Curci Investments LLC v. Baldwin, as researched and synthesized publicly available content. Mention of these authorities does not imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation. Consult licensed counsel for advice on your specific situation.
Educational only. We are not a law firm. We do not provide legal or tax advice. We are a Wyoming LLC formation and registered agent service. Statutes and case law change; verify current text and case status before relying on this article.